Redefining The Function Of South African CSI Boards For The Twenty-First Century

I want to acknowledge that my previous article may have caused discomfort and offense to some individuals, and I understand that the consequences of those actions persist. However, I want to assure you that not everything is negative. While some may have questioned my intentions and sense of entitlement, we are here to provide support and assistance for those who need it.

In today’s ever-changing business environment, the role of CSI boards must evolve. As such, this article aims to assist South African CSI Managers in comprehending the dynamic nature of CSI boards and highlight the need for a novel approach that encourages collaboration and strategic oversight, moving away from hierarchical control.

To start, let’s discuss how CSI boards should be organized in the 21st century. Historically, CSI boards were responsible for safeguarding funds and ensuring that the organization’s development was consistent with its strategic goals. However, this approach often resulted in a top-down management style that stifled innovation and restricted the potential for greater impact. This strategy can still be utilized in nations that don’t have CSI legislation, but the CSI board’s function in South Africa should shift from commanding to collaborating and instructing to supporting.

A crucial aspect of modernizing CSI boards is compiling a diverse group of individuals with a variety of skills and points of view. The board should serve as a team of advisors, providing input and direction to the organization’s chief or CSI Manager. By including professionals from diverse disciplines such as finance, law, and marketing, the board can provide valuable insight and assist the CSI Manager in making educated decisions. Ultimately, the CSI Manager should make the final decision. To avoid confusion with the CSI Manager, who can be referred to as “Director,” we recommend renaming the board members to “Board Officers” to better reflect their roles.

In the 21st-century board structure, the CSI Manager or equivalent possesses the ultimate decision-making authority within the organization, regardless of whether they are the CEO of a Foundation or an executive director. The board’s responsibility is to serve as an oversight body and sounding board for the CSI Manager, ensuring that decisions are exhaustively considered and influenced by a variety of perspectives. This approach allows the CSI Manager to assume ownership of their responsibilities while benefiting from the board members’ collective wisdom and expertise.

To assure the effectiveness of CSI Managers and the board, it is essential to have a robust measurement framework. This framework should be established prior to the hiring process, delineating objectives, targets, and milestones that align with the vision and mission of the organization. The CSI Manager’s key performance indicators (KPIs) should be evaluated every twelve to twenty four months, allowing the board to determine if the CSI Manager is meeting the organization’s collective vision and objectives.

Implementing a 21st-century board structure at CSI will present a number of obstacles. Changing from a hierarchical to a collaborative model requires a shift in culture, transparent communication, and an openness to new perspectives. Some board members may need to modify their expectations and abandon conventional notions of control. However, this novel approach has significant benefits. CSI Managers can make more informed decisions, adapt to changing conditions, and foster innovation by leveraging the expertise and diversity of the board. Empowering CSI Managers while providing the necessary support and guidance enables them to utilize their talents more effectively and fosters a sense of ownership and accountability.

As the world continues to evolve, so must the structures and methods of CSI in South Africa. CSI can position itself for greater success and influence by adopting a 21st-century board structure that prioritizes collaboration, expertise, and strategic oversight. CSI Managers and board members must recognize the need for this transition and collaborate to create an environment that fosters creativity, adaptability, and sound decision-making. CSI can navigate the complex challenges of the modern era and make a lasting impact in their respective disciplines by undergoing this transformation.

Lastly, I want to remind everyone of Henry Ford’s sage advice and focus on learning from our errors rather than merely discussing them. By adopting a new approach to CSI boards, fostering collaboration, and empowering CSI Managers, we can drive positive change and accomplish greater impact in a business environment that is constantly evolving.

Mtetwa Simphiwe
Simphiwe Mtetwa is the Managing Director and Editor-In-Chief for Corporate Social Responsibility News South Africa.


  • Lesedi says:

    In agreement with the article. To adopt new strategies for current and future challenges we need change in many aspects. Board members must have expertise in accordance with vision of the company in order to support managers to achieve the corporate objectives. The era of the board that just approve/disapprove must end. The must have meaningful contribution to the organisation while they ensure guidance and support.

  • Dr Cebisa Dwaba says:

    We need support in Providing Funding for “Missing Middle Students” who are from Previously Disadvantaged Students.

    We are in cohoots with the Organisation that is Headed by All 26 University Chancellors. We could if allowed to have a meeting to discuss.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Share This

Copy Link to Clipboard